• 0203 811 8175
  • Make an Enquiry

    Request A Call BackX

    ADDRESSBerkeley Square House, Berkeley Square, Mayfair, London, W1J 6BD
    +44 (0)203 811 8175

    PLEASE FILL IN YOUR DETAILS

    Sending your message. Please wait...

    Thanks for sending your message! We'll get back to you shortly.

    There was a problem sending your message. Please try again.

    Please complete all the fields in the form before sending.

Effects of Brexit on the Plastic Surgery Industry in London

Brexit, the historic decision made by the UK to exit the European Union in 2016, sent shockwaves throughout various economic sectors, reshaping the face of British business and trade. While industries like finance, agriculture, and manufacturing found themselves in the limelight of Brexit discussions, other sectors, perhaps less evident at first glance, experienced notable changes and challenges. Among these was the plastic surgery industry in London, a city renowned for its medical expertise and a hub for both residents and international visitors seeking aesthetic and reconstructive procedures. 

This article aims to dissect the multifaceted impacts of Brexit on this niche yet significant industry, exploring its economic, regulatory, and societal effects. With a holistic approach, we will delve deep into the transformations the London-based plastic surgery arena underwent in the post-Brexit landscape. (1)

Background

The plastic surgery industry in London has long held a reputation for both its pioneering procedures and its top-tier specialists. Historically, London has been a nexus for medical advancements, with the field of plastic surgery being no exception. This section aims to provide an essential background that will help in understanding the subsequent effects of Brexit.

Historical Perspective: The origins of plastic surgery in London can be traced back to the World Wars, when reconstructive procedures became necessary for injured soldiers. The subsequent decades saw a shift from merely reconstructive to also aesthetic surgeries, catering to a growing clientele seeking both functional and cosmetic enhancements.

Pre-Brexit Landscape: In the years leading up to Brexit, London witnessed a boom in the plastic surgery sector. Several factors contributed to this:

Medical Tourism: London became a sought-after destination for individuals from across the globe, especially Europe, seeking high-quality procedures.

Industry Growth: Rapid advancements in surgical techniques, combined with growing social acceptance, resulted in a surge of clinics and practices across the city.

Economic Significance: The industry’s growth translated into substantial revenue, not just from surgeries but also from related sectors like cosmetic product sales and post-operative care.

London’s Unique Position: The city’s multicultural tapestry made it a diverse hub for medical practices. With specialists from around the world, London offered a wide array of procedures tailored to various ethnicities, further solidifying its global appeal.

In light of this flourishing backdrop, the decision of Brexit brought forth a series of questions and concerns. The potential implications on this industry, stemming from economic changes, regulatory shifts, and social perceptions, became topics of considerable debate. The subsequent sections of this article will delve into these concerns, shedding light on the post-Brexit reality of the plastic surgery industry in London.

The Direct Economic Impact

Brexit, with its vast economic repercussions, touched almost every industry in the UK, and the plastic surgery sector in London was no exception. A variety of interconnected economic elements underwent shifts, either as immediate consequences of the decision or as long-term ramifications. Here, we break down the key economic areas influenced by Brexit:

plastic surgery techniques

 

Currency Fluctuations

Immediate Impact: The value of the pound witnessed significant volatility post-referendum. Its decrease in value made some surgical procedures and treatments more affordable for foreign clients, potentially boosting medical tourism in the short term.

Long-term Effect: However, a weaker pound meant that importing surgical materials and equipment became more expensive, impacting the overall cost structures for many clinics.

Import Tariffs and Cost of Materials

New Trade Agreements: Brexit necessitated the UK to form new trade agreements. The absence of prior privileges with EU partners meant potential tariffs on imported goods, directly affecting the cost of surgical tools, implants, and other essential materials.

Domestic Alternatives: Higher import costs nudged some clinics to explore locally-produced alternatives. While this supported domestic manufacturers, there were concerns about the availability and quality of some specialised products.

Changes in Medical Tourism

Shift in Demographics: The initial allure of more affordable procedures due to currency devaluation might have attracted more overseas patients. However, potential visa complexities, travel restrictions, and general Brexit uncertainties could have deterred some EU patients from choosing London as their preferred destination.

Economic Analysis: A closer look reveals a mixed picture. Some clinics reported an influx of non-EU international patients, while others witnessed a decline, especially from neighbouring EU countries.

In summary, the direct economic impact of Brexit on the plastic surgery industry in London presented a mosaic of challenges and opportunities. While certain elements like currency devaluation offered short-term benefits, the broader picture necessitated clinics, practitioners, and stakeholders to adapt to a dynamic economic landscape, re-strategizing their operations and outreach in light of the new trade and economic realities.

Regulatory Changes and Challenges

Brexit not only heralded economic transformations but also ushered in an era of regulatory recalibrations. The separation from the European Union necessitated the UK to re-evaluate and, in some cases, reshape its regulatory frameworks, directly influencing the medical field, including plastic surgery. This section highlights the regulatory changes post-Brexit and the subsequent challenges faced by the plastic surgery industry in London.

Licensing and Qualification Recognition

Foreign Surgeons in the UK: Prior to Brexit, medical qualifications from EU nations were typically recognised in the UK. Post-Brexit, the recognition process became more intricate, potentially causing delays or hurdles for EU surgeons wishing to practice in London.

UK Surgeons in the EU: Similarly, UK surgeons faced challenges having their qualifications recognised in EU countries, limiting their opportunities for practice or training within the EU.

Medical Device and Product Regulations

Conformity Assessments: Before Brexit, medical devices and products used in surgeries in the UK generally adhered to EU standards. After the split, the UK had to establish its standards and assessments, leading to potential discrepancies between UK and EU regulations.

Approval Processes: With the UK no longer under the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the approval processes for new surgical products and devices became independent, which might either expedite or delay the introduction of new tools in the market, depending on the efficiency of the new regulatory body.

Patient Safety and Standards

Standardisation Concerns: Given the deviation from EU-established medical standards, there were concerns about maintaining the high standards London’s plastic surgery industry was known for. It became imperative for regulatory bodies in the UK to ensure that patient safety and surgical excellence remained uncompromised.

Information Exchange: Earlier, there was seamless exchange of medical research, surgical techniques, and patient safety protocols between the UK and EU nations. Post-Brexit, while collaborations continued, there was a need to establish new channels and agreements for such exchanges.

While Brexit gave the UK autonomy over its medical regulations, it also brought forth challenges in harmonising with global standards and ensuring that the changes did not adversely affect the quality of care and innovation in the plastic surgery sector. The industry, along with regulators, had to navigate these challenges meticulously to maintain London’s esteemed position in the global plastic surgery landscape.

The Impact on Workforce and Migration

The ramifications of Brexit stretched beyond just economic and regulatory landscapes, deeply influencing the human resources that form the backbone of the plastic surgery industry in London. The city, known for its international workforce, faced new challenges and dynamics in terms of migration, training, and employment opportunities. Let’s delve into the specifics of these changes:

Surgeon Migration

Exiting the Capital: Some EU surgeons, facing uncertainties regarding their long-term status in the UK, chose to relocate back to their home countries or to other EU nations where their qualifications and rights were unquestioned.

Reduced Inflow: London’s plastic surgery industry, which had historically benefited from a steady inflow of talent from the EU, witnessed a slowdown. The added bureaucracy and ambiguities surrounding the right to work made it less appealing for some foreign surgeons to move to London.

Training and Development Opportunities

Limited EU Collaborations: Historically, surgeons in London frequently participated in training programs, seminars, and workshops across the EU. With Brexit, these collaborations became more complex, potentially limiting opportunities for knowledge exchange and skills development.

Domestic Focus: To counteract the reduction in EU-based training, there was a push towards enhancing and expanding domestic training programs. Institutions in London began to collaborate more closely with other UK centres of excellence, striving to ensure that surgeons received top-tier training and development within the country.

Employment Concerns

Hiring Challenges: Clinics and hospitals in London found it more challenging to hire staff, particularly those from the EU. This was due to a combination of migration concerns and the increased complexities in recognising foreign qualifications.

Labour Costs: The reduced influx of international talent, coupled with a potential exodus of existing EU staff, could lead to increased demand for domestic professionals, potentially driving up wages and labor costs in the industry.

The workforce and migration impact of Brexit on the plastic surgery industry in London highlighted the profound interconnections between politics, borders, and the medical profession. While the industry grappled with some challenges, it also provided an opportunity for London to further solidify its domestic training programs and create a self-sustaining ecosystem. Yet, the true essence of London’s global appeal lies in its international collaborations, and only time would tell how these dynamics balance out in the post-Brexit era.

cosmetic surgeon training

Patient Perspectives

At the heart of the plastic surgery industry are the patients, individuals seeking to enhance or restore aspects of their physical appearance. Their choices, driven by trust, expertise, and socio-economic factors, play a pivotal role in shaping the industry’s direction. With Brexit redefining many of these elements, it’s crucial to understand the changing sentiments of both domestic and international patients.

Domestic Patient Sentiment

Trust in Quality: With the regulatory divergence from the EU, some UK patients expressed concerns about the continued standard of care and the quality of medical devices. Would London maintain its high benchmarks of excellence in a post-Brexit era?

Economic Considerations: Fluctuations in the economy, combined with potential rising costs due to import tariffs, left some wondering if procedure prices would escalate, making certain treatments less accessible.

Perception of Surgeons: The potential departure of EU surgeons led to a mixed sentiment. While some patients felt concern over losing these experts, others rallied behind the expertise of UK-trained surgeons, trusting the rich medical legacy of London.

International Patient Sentiment

London as a Destination: London’s reputation as a global hub for plastic surgery faced new challenges. Concerns about travel complexities, especially for EU citizens, coupled with currency fluctuations, influenced decisions. Some saw the weakened pound as an opportunity for more affordable treatments, while others hesitated due to the broader uncertainties.

Communication and Outreach: International patients sought clarity. Would their post-operative care be affected? How would potential revisions be handled if surgeons relocated? Clinics had to bolster their communication strategies to reassure patients of continued excellence and support.

Wider Societal Implications

Media’s Role: Media narratives played a significant role in shaping patient perspectives. Stories highlighting positive patient experiences post-Brexit were balanced by those emphasizing challenges or perceived declines in service quality.

Cultural Impact: As with any significant geopolitical event, Brexit influenced cultural sentiments. The way society viewed and engaged with the idea of plastic surgery, both within and outside the UK, underwent subtle changes, influenced by broader narratives of identity, nationalism, and globalism.

While the plastic surgery industry in London navigated the technical challenges posed by Brexit, it also faced the more intangible, yet equally critical, task of managing and understanding patient perceptions. The ultimate success of the industry in the post-Brexit era would hinge not just on economic and regulatory adaptability but also on its ability to maintain and nurture the trust of its patient base.

The Road Ahead: Resilience and Adaptation

Every industry, when faced with transformative changes, must find ways to adapt, innovate, and remain resilient. The plastic surgery sector in London, in the wake of Brexit, stands at a crossroads, poised to redefine its future trajectory. Here, we explore potential strategies, challenges, and opportunities as the industry moves forward in a post-Brexit world.

Innovation and Research

Leveraging Technology: Embracing technological advancements, from AI-driven consultations to the latest in surgical robotics, can help London maintain its competitive edge in the global landscape.

Research Collaborations: While Brexit might have altered formal partnerships, the academic and medical research community remains global. Building new partnerships outside the EU or strengthening existing ones can foster continued innovation.

Strengthening Domestic Capacities

Medical Training: There’s an opportunity to further elevate the standards of medical training within the UK, ensuring the next generation of surgeons are equipped with world-class skills, irrespective of EU collaborations.

Supply Chain Resilience: By supporting local manufacturers and businesses related to surgical tools, materials, and technology, the industry can create a robust, self-sustaining ecosystem less vulnerable to international disruptions.

Global Outreach

Beyond the EU: While the relationship with the EU undergoes redefinition, there’s a vast world beyond it. Expanding outreach to Asia, the Middle East, the Americas, and other regions can diversify the patient base and ensure continued growth.

Rebranding Efforts: Effective marketing and rebranding can emphasise London’s legacy, expertise, and continued commitment to excellence in plastic surgery, helping in attracting a global clientele.

Regulatory Evolution

Streamlined Processes: While establishing its own standards, the UK can aim for efficient, streamlined processes that facilitate quicker approvals and maintain patient safety.

International Accords: Crafting bilateral agreements with countries or regions can ensure mutual recognition of qualifications and standards, fostering an environment of collaboration.

Patient-Centric Approach

Feedback Mechanisms: By actively seeking feedback from both domestic and international patients, clinics can better understand evolving needs and concerns, ensuring services are tailored appropriately.

Transparency: In a changing landscape, clear, transparent communication about procedures, costs, aftercare, and potential risks will be pivotal in building and maintaining trust.

Brexit, undeniably, brought challenges to the plastic surgery industry in London. However, with these challenges come opportunities to reimagine, reinvent, and reinforce the city’s esteemed position in the global arena. The road ahead will require a harmonious blend of innovation, adaptability, and a relentless focus on excellence.

I am proud to say that Berkeley Square Medical continues to be at the forefront of innovation within the plastic surgery industry while maintaining our exceptional quality standards at the same time. We are ready to face the challenges and continue to serve our patients in the years to come.

Sanjay Rai
Sanjay Rai

Make Your Enquiry

+44(0)203 811 8175

    Tell us about you

    A Few Contact Details

    Which procedure are you enquiring about?


    captcha

    Make Your Enquiry

    +44(0)203 811 8175

    Any questions, enquiries, or just looking for a consultation? Simply send your enquiry here and we will get back to you with a reply promptly.

      Tell us about you

      A Few Contact Details

      Which procedure are you enquiring about?


      captcha

      COPYRIGHT © BERKELEY SQUARE MEDICAL 2022. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

        Tell us about you

        A Few Contact Details

        Which procedure are you enquiring about?


        captcha

        ×

          Tell us about you

          A Few Contact Details

          Which procedure are you enquiring about?

          ×

            Tell us about you

            A Few Contact Details

            Which procedure are you enquiring about?

            ×